dagreenblazer

How cool! I didn't realise Kim had already done photo shoot and met them all!! DNegs is an absolute genius of poker though I always loved Dwan for his sheer mentalness at playing - would be epic to play them both, though freaking scary too lol! Be awesome if Kim ends up being a big face in poker too! Would love to see him flashing some WSOP bracelet drip on stream!

Haha! That is such a funny whisper conversation! Cheers for posting dude, and you're correct overall about most crypto sites. Gotta say tho, Elinas was giving a role model lesson in customer service!! - honestly, his dedication & sincerity to helping you play blew any genuine casino live chat I've ever spoken to out the water!! And he's only in for a measly 0.02%, which he freely discloses as well! And, he also advises that he never re-deposits when he loses his own balance gambling - i'm actually starting to admire this guy lol!! Plus, I can't remember the last time William Hill swore on their mothers life for me either - cheapskates!!

Sounds more to me like he's run out of credit with his Tijuana connection!

Wishing you all the very best Kim - is a brilliant opportunity and hopefully you'll come back richer too! Have fun dude!

Thanks for the input DS and yes that was my line of thinking too - plus i do love the game for how much more regularly decent multi's can pop but wanted to find a way to be staking less so the multi's count for more when they do hit. I'm quite happy dropping the CT segment too because it's a 1 in 3 gamble once it lands still anyway and imo is too volatile on payouts considering it's just 1 wheel segment only. I'm going to keep giving this a try as at the very least i like the fact it allows more playtime too for not much less wheel coverage.

I know alot of people playing CT often choose to not bet on Coinflip (cause it can have long periods of being dogs eggs), and though i like the idea of reducing how many bonus segments you cover, i was too never too sold on it cause it means you're missing out on 4 segments of the wheel...... Yet, just recently, my housemate who was playing CT for 1st time ever did a variant I've never seen any streamer do before, which was simply to ignore CT and just flat bet on CF, CH & Pachi. (Not exactly rocket science, but it honestly never crossed my mind before - i was sold on CT being the flagship, premium bonus!!) The few rounds we've played since have all been positive, and I've done a cursory runback through a few dozen pages of draw history which add up ok so far. Per 100 spins, i've overall found ignoring CT to be more profitable when it's a winning session, and also far less damaging when it's a losing one. From now on i am definitely no longer covering CT, as having my total stake stretched too thin was always an element of the game i disliked, plus this means each round I'm only paying 3 units to cover 8 segments instead of paying 4 units to cover 9. So was wondering, sinc I've never seen it done before, if anyone else has stopped covering CT and how you found it?? I know it may sound like Heresy but i am quitting covering that 1 CT milk segment!

I like the cards bet on England dude - i never thought about that, as wrongly assumed the Ref would go easy on San Marino, but he was pulling them up on everything immediately lol! I actually ended up feeling sorry for how strict he was being! GG!!

Dude......!! You just queried the lack of gravity in the Evo studio........ Take my word for it when i say reading Patent Applications will be far, far beyond you!! I can't deny, this has become the post that just keeps on giving!!

I honestly thought this forum was for intelligent gamblers, but it's not: it's just deluded degens, and not even funny ones at that. How many time does it have to be explained that all casino games are games of mathematical chance - the maths is making the casino money - THEY DO NOT NEED TO RIG ANYTHING!!! Muppets out here believing that if the casino suddenly stopped doing all "their secret fixing" that every punter is suddenly gonna start winning big??? You think if Evo doesn't 'rig' their wheel that the players are gonna suddenly clean them out??? Lol Get Real!! THE MATHS MAKES THE MONEY!!!!! Stupid uneducated idiots who think "oh, i must only be losing because they used magnets or oh, look how the wierd bounce of 1 spin proves it's fake" are the ideal customers for casinos - selling poor value maths based casino games is alot easier when your customers don't understand maths and have a poor grasp of scientific reality.

Just abit of friendly advice to everyone new or old to gambling, about making sure you're taking all the regular freebies your casino site might be offering, as from my experience of mates who gamble, most either don't know about or don't bother with them, yet in my experience they can be worthwhile for 5 mins of clicking everyday. I do only use William Hill, though I'm not putting major money through it, yet from doing their free daily bonus drop game, free daily scratchcard game and the odd weekly free spins, etc I've probably had between £150 - £200 profit from free spins plus about £30 in assorted free bets this year alone. Most sites do some variant of free daily games, and 2 mates i recently convinced to stop being lazy are finally getting lots of free spins/bets from Paddy Power, Ladbrokes, Betfair which had previously been sitting untouched for the 3 years they been signed up. The other thing I'd recommend is click every promo dropdown on each page, as often different promos are sort of hidden round the site and sometimes will only show on say Sportsbook but not Casino, etc - hell, click the Bingo page too, click everything, as you never know where a free promo may be! Check your emails too, as often WH will only email me an offer and it won't be on a site dropdown. Plus, if you're playing alot of games/slots, there are often site side jackpot drops/raffles running, which are separate to the provider jackpot drops that pop up before each game, but the in-site ones usually need to be opted into via a separate promo dropdown, and again i know people who have missed opting into site drops/raffles for games they ended up playing- i won £50 in-site raffle when Crash or Cash launched and literally did 8 spins at min bet of £0.50 - I don't think that's luck, I think that's no-one else hardly seeing the opt-in lol! And if you're putting proper money through Sportsbook, then again, alot of the bet x amount and get x amount free offers only come via the daily scratchcard, etc, so if you're gonna be staking anyway, have a click of the freebies first as often instead of free spins, the prize will be a pretty generous bet & get type offer, which as may as well take it if there! I know to some people this may sound cheap, though I'm only micro-stakes anyway, and any free money off a casino is always a good thing, even if you just throw it back at them again! I just hate to see people not taking the freebies and you never know when the free spins might squirt a nice bonus out! Hope it helps someone!

Incredible Multi though this also has to be the Best Replay Ever!!! Hearing the hosts loving it and going crazy too is brilliant - you edited out beginning of spin where before it lands you can hear Basil off stage shouting "Go On, Go On!!"Hahaha was absolutely awesome to see!!

Yo dude, that is a crazy story and glad you know you're verified for future big winnings at least! Only thing i was gonna say if helps possible strat was you can also bet on teams just not to lose - on bookies i think most call it something like 'Double Chance' and is usually down near bottom of the markets list - it obviously pays lower odds than win only, though does cover both win & draw outcomes. And if you not been into footie bets before, essentially what you're doing is similar to Arbitrage betting, if you wanna google it for research, though it can risk account bans, restrictions too if bookies find out and be alot more work than worth it but still interesting to learn nonetheless.

Haha! Brilliant video & awesome win - BIG congrats dude!

37985

I'm only doing a mini punt on this but noticed on my bookies that crazily Napoli are 2/13 at home & Legia Warsaw are 18/1 to win away - Napoli are dominating Serie A but they're woeful in Europa and currently bottom on 1 point - Legia Warsaw have lost their last couple of domestics but are kicking ass in Europe, especially away from home & top the group on 6 points. This is the match Napoli need to turn their Europa form round in, so it may well turn into a Napoli avalanche, but considering my same bookies has Genk at 10/1 away to West Ham, the Warsaw price at 18/1 seems amazing value to take a punt on them taking 3 wins from 3 games.

To my mind, i wouldn't be surprised if soon all these sponsored streams had to start carrying the "Paid Promotion" or "This Is An Advertisement" type banners, as they're never going to be banned, but i do think the bad press over an issue like gambling will force the streaming sites to do their usual minimal response and make them all start displaying banners at least. As for how much the big sponsoreds seem to win all the time, i think alot of this is just confirmation bias, and they win/lose as much as anyone else - it's just they're putting the volume in and the excitement of high stakes wins means viewers soon forget earlier losses - I've seen a fair few of them rinse through their sponsored reloads and then as soon as they hit a big bonus all of chat is whooping and cheering, and suddenly everyone forgets that's only actually like 50% back or something. I think any wins these streamers get to keep from slot wins is probably irrelevant to them compared to their actual sponsored contracts.

Thanks for the information dude - sounds interesting & wishing you good luck with that big accumulator!

I'm not on any of those bookies so can't enter though Good Luck to Everyone who does! I think gonna be a Wilder win and probably round 3 stoppage. Fury was looking nervous & flustered in that press conference - Wilder just looked calm & confident.

Lol considering global payment fraud was estimated at $32 billion last year, i think it's safe assume there's numerous ways criminals can access people's bank accts and spend their money!! Which merchant the funds were spent at it is irrelevant, so speaking to Leo is correctly pointless and this is a bank issue only - tho Am glad to hear you got it sorted though dude and would love to know which bank it was with, as that is a credibility quick resolution.

@Navyboy24 it's not often i read through that many pages on 1 post but was an enthralling story and I'm real sorry to hear how dickish those NY idiots have been to you - i agree, court should wangle out fine for you though. Without going through it all again, only 2 things i wanted to mention was if that was 1st £2K deposit with them & no previous depo history then £2K alone is not enough to trigger AML checks - if they've found you're making multiple depos with other casinos them yes the £2K with them is enough to trigger AML but they would need to show evidential proof they saw this too - otherwise £2K alone with them & they got no other casinos proof is bullshit for AML denial. Secondly, if they are banning for AML they will need to also show proof that they registered your case with relevant regulators and that they have fulfilled their obligations in reporting & you should be on a blacklist now and potentially facing criminal investigation!!! I would guarantee 100% that they haven't done this because you very likely haven't been reported anywhere for AML, you aren't on any blacklist and you're not gonna be facing criminal charges because they are solely using this as a cop-out to not pay - none of their measly mouthed emails show any semblance of following AML requirements and any serious cases should be getting escalated out of their hands way sooner than 6 months! Casinos don't have AML investigation requirements; they only have AML reporting requirements - Them waiting 6 months on AML decisions is verging on collusion in itself anyway lol! Fcuk them hard and i hope your solicitor nails down the compensation too as courts do rightfully compensate well for mental anguish nowadays also. GL dude!

Yo People, I'd love to hear anyone's feedback on new Evolution game Cash or Crash and, if you were successful, how you played?? THOUGHTS: From my initial plays, i like the game format as it caters well to all levels of stakes and, especially useful for lower bankroll players, the 99% RTP combined with long game rounds means you can get alot of playtime for relatively small money (i made £1.60 last nearly 3 hours on it the other night - same amount would last 5 minutes on Monopoly & probably 2 minutes on CT lol!) The main points i like about it though is that: 1. start draw is over 2/1 odds in your favour, so far better than roulette, etc 2. the fact that the game is designed to play upon people's greed as the way casino will make money BUT if you're not a greedy person, you can bank small, continuous profits. 3. My initial sessions with mini-money have all messed up by me getting greedy and tempted by higher prizes in front of me AND not sticking to rules i personally agreed to - yet my trawl through draw history shows me that sticking to a pre-agreed level to reach is best way and NOT deviating - it is the temptation to deviate that will make casinos money from this game. STRAT IDEAS: Firstly, since i haven't seen it mentioned elsewhere, Evo have apparently published an Optimal Play Strat in their Help Logs - is as follows; "Strategy (Uncapped): Continue taking balls up until level 9 and then stop. If you get a golden ball, continue until a red ball is drawn. When a red ball is drawn after a gold ball, only continue if you are on level 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15 and stop at the round after." My initial trawl through draw history shows that level 9 seems to hit an acceptable amount of times for the amount you need to put in to see it come round, plus 9 chances of hitting a golden ball to go lots further is really good, and also seems to happen on an acceptable frequency. Also, Evo's advice of take 1 extra step if on correct level after gold shield breaks does seem to be the +EV move overall too. My own thoughts though is that setting level 9 as your target does require bigger bankroll and is more volatile - from my musings, i think for me level 4 seems a good level to aim for always cashing at as it comes around alot more frequently, yet you also have 4 shots at catching a golden ball to go higher for free, and stats history shows gold balls get you past level 4 at least once or twice every 20 odd spins. The only deviation i would possibly add was if I'm running well, then i would go to level 5 on odd occasion or maybe set as whole new level as gold ball coming level 5 really boosts profits if you've been disciplined before, or if I'm not running good then i would resolutely stick to level 4 only. Again, I'm not fully decided on this, as deviation does seem to be the killer, but in terms of if running well at your set level already, i think just increasing 1 more level only is sensible option and again i like how the game design allows this as an option. I have also considered the level 1 min cash strat, and it certainly works well for any wagering requirements as you basically bubble along even for hours, but it's not good for profit lol, and Martingaleing can't really be applied as you need to 5x your bet every lost draw to cover you're only getting 1.2x win back. D'Alemberting it does seem like may work better though i haven't sketched that one out yet, plus again i think this game seems to work best with flat bets every time and more work off the odds of the balls and hitting levels to make money. Excuse the ramble anyway though would love to hear anyone's thoughts, as when i try googling, all that comes back is stuff about that stupid Crash crypto game!) Thanks in advance!

I don't know whether I love you or hate you after reading all that lol! Hehe! Big Congratulations dude - that is an epic run!!

WTF is that customer service reps Dice analogy about??! Maybe I'm being old-fashioned but i would kind of expect someone working for a casino to be able to describe theoretical RTP in much clearer terms!! The droober clearly doesn't know what he's talking about, or he knows and he's keeping quiet cause they want to keep stealing your money - either way i would ditch that site asap!

Lol and the stupid twonk even has a banner advert saying " it's profit every bro, on that Casumo Show"!!! Fcuking liar!!

Yo Thunder, i can totally hear what you're saying, and i think you touch on an aspect of gambling that isn't always mentioned but is one of the most powerful reasons we keep playing - like you rightly say, it is to a large part about the money, as that's why we're there in the first place, but also it soon becomes more than just about the money - it turns into where you don't want to accept being beaten, and you don't want to have to accept that you've lost & look stupid - i often had where I'd keep hammering away not just to win back losses (as by then I've given up on the actual balance & accepted that financially I've fcuked it) but purely because i just want to beat the game AND not have it beat me - it becomes almost more like playing a video game rather than gambling. But, the trouble is, with most actual real games there is an element of skill, an element of learning, etc so often not giving up & keeping on hammering away (practising) is a often good way to eventually win - but with most gambling games we play there is no skill element whatsoever and the game is physically designed so that the longer you play the more you lose. Yet ironically, the lack of skill involved also means there's less external factors that you can then blame for your losses, which is why you end up blaming & hating on yourself as that's all the game design leaves you with to blame. And casinos know that people don't like being made to look stupid and that they will come back for 'another go' which is perfect if you're running games where people lose in the long run! And when that is tied in with big, flashy lights & signs all over the casinos shouting about how you can win big easy, you just further feel like a stupid loser as the sites love to give the impression that everyone else is winning AND winning easily. This aspect of human psychology of not accepting when we're beaten is what's helped our species rule the world, but it can also be turned against us just as easily, and it is these psychological traits that casinos look to exploit. You're not a loser at all dude - you're clearly someone who cares about their family, as someone who didn't wouldn't have written that post in the first place - the casino games themselves are the losers because they are only set to serve 1 master; the casino. You are not a loser because you approached this game honestly and played by the rules - the game is the loser because it had to fake & lie to you about your chances of winning in order to get you to play. It is hard to accept that a game has beaten you but if you can separate the logic of it all from the emotion if it all, you'll soon see the games offer poor value to everyone, not just you. Certainly however much you threw at the casino is a separate concern for your personal budget, but don't throw your self-esteem at them too, as that is how they trap you into returning - casinos only make people feel like losers so you come back and spend more to try & get rid of the bad feeling. The only real way to get rid of that bad feeling though is as you've already correctly mentioned; spend it on the kids, spend it on the family, spend it on yourself! The kids and the family will give you alot better returns than any casino will! It's good that you are taking personal responsibility for your actions though don't think you have to cross the line into beating yourself up too. Wishing you all the best dude!