dirtystack

Fair enough. Didn’t even realise it needed a 30x or higher win for the raffle so my whole post was a bit off anyway.

They have gained a good chunk of market share over the last couple of years. Wonder how much of their popularity is due to the drops and wins promos they have running 24/7.

You looking at them in the wrong way - they are extremely generous and +ev for everyone who takes part. Take this promo for example - this thread has 29 replies - some replies will be multiple by the same person so they are even more generous and higher +ev then my explanation will demonstrate. Lets round it up to 30 entries. Remove the top 5 entries and you are left with 25 entries in the draw for the €50 raffle. 10 of these entries will win the €50 The €50 raffle is massive +ev on its own. You have a 40% chance of winning €50 - all you need to do is submit a screenshot. Every 5 promos you should, on average, win twice and receive a total of €100 which is an average of €20 per promo. To lose €20 on a game with 95% rtp you would need to wager, talking averages here, €400. This means that if you wagered €400 on each promo then, with the average raffle return, you would be break even from the random raffle alone - you would still be +ev overall as you would win one of top 5 placement prizes now and then. It is up to you how much you wager though - if you were to attempt to just realise the random raffle +ev then all you would need to do is a couple of spins and post any winning screenshot and some feedback. This would result in each promo granting you an average of near to €20 profit. They are massively generous prizepools and I think we should be grateful they are available to us. They are so generous that I don’t see how they are of any real benefit to the casino hosting them. A €2500 prize pool on a 95% game would require €50 000 to be wagered to recoup the cost of the prize pool - I don’t see the 30 entrants spinning at min bet wagering €50 000 during the promos duration. Might be the odd exception, on average though, I doubt it. The outlay is probably justified in that the streamers give the game promoted some extra exposure via the livestreams, occasional new signups, people depositing to play the promo and losing their money on other games. In short - you can’t moan about the cost of promo participation because the actual promo, even the raffle alone, is +ev. If you don’t take part then you are actually costing yourself money.

Are these all WHG casinos?

Damn, wish my passport would arrive so i can sign up some new casinos.

What has twitch income got to do with whether or not someone is playing with real funds or some fake setup? Whatever is in the twitch leak would just be the income from viewer numbers, subs and donations wouldn’t it? Doesn't really say anything about whether or not the stream is fake - it’s just the revenue the channel makes. Unless I am mistaken, feel free to correct me. Don't get me wrong though, I don’t watch any of these people and what I have seen I do not trust.

Like the game, the scatters seem pointless though, never had the feature trigger from 3 scatters. They just seem to get in the way for the most part. For a bonus buy game it is still enjoyable playing the basegame. Will be on my playlist. 210x

I'm going to be playing 24/7 £0.50 a round on pachinko only for 7 days lol. Will post results. Assuming 40 seconds per spin: 15120 spins, £7560 bet Should cost me around £428.652 if the RTP holds up - of course variance plays a part but lets see.

Bear in mind thatI’ve seen the same thing happen, twice in 20 years, when supervising roulette in a land based casino. If it can happen there, in 20 years, watching typically 2 roulettes at a time for around 4 hours a day, 5 days a week - similar anomalies will happen and be picked up. I’ve seen a lot of weird shit - I’ve done a no spin that shot straight up and the ball never came down. Shot straight up and plugged the only hole in the white ceiling. Was a mystery until months later when the maintenance man dislodged it when adjusting some lights. I had a mouse fall on me when dealing Baccarat, fell on my head, jumped into the float, jumped onto my seat then shot off down the pit, a polish inspector screamed and threw a nearby manager into the mouses path. Lots of weird stuff happens to break the monotony. mercifully.

You could also get magnets and see how possible it is to make something hover. Unless it is very rigidly held in place its not going to work the way you think. The ball would not get stuck in a repelling state, it would naturally seek to rotate itself to the attraction state - the spin on roulette ball would not be enough centrifugal force to stop the self correcting rotation for any noticeable duration. That is if there were a magnet in both the ball and the wheel which would be silly. The magnet set up you have in mind would only be practical if there was magnets in the wheel, can have 37 of them, one in each number, individually activated and have a piece of magnetic material in the ball (Lead for example, any metal that is attracted to a magnet), this way it would only ever attract the ball and not repel it. It would be a massive oversight for the evil scientists at Evilution to put a magnet in the ball when just a little metal in the ball, and the above 37 individually activated magnets in the wheel, would be infinitely simpler to execute. A magnet in the ball would need the whole wheel to be made out of non magnetic material - roulette wheels are heavy lumps of metal that are finished in the varnished wood effect we all love. Regardless, I'm not saying anything is impossible- just leaving out some food for thought/shower thoughts.

The less you positions you cover the less you will lose. See what happens if you bet the same total amount 3 positions as you would, in total, bet on the 4. £3 on all 4 positions compared to £4 on 3 positions. £12 total bet either way. If not doing it that way then the lower loss and the bigger win session without playing CT is likely just because you are laying out less each round.

IMG_2564.MP4

It is only you who can’t see that they have been completely picked apart. I work in the industry yes, I don’t have any desire to defend the industry, I don’t see casinos as beneficial to society. If all casinos closed overnight I’d be upset that I’d have nowhere to gamble - not that I’d be out of a job. I just don’t like, and we discussed this in previous posts, people stating opinion as fact or lying to emphasis their point. Stating that a ball is defying the laws of physics when you don’t have a clue about physics…. My opinion is that wild conjecture, and the above mentioned lying, undermine any valid discussion as to the legitimacy of anything.

I enjoyed that.

Oh SteveJ, I shouldn't do this but, well, here we go, you have become meme. You are now immortal. Whenever anyone sees the following meme, they will understand the meaning: That is what people will understand when they see the following meme, an image so beautiful in its simplicity. Here it is, created with a love that will persist long after inflation renders the current understanding of physics redundant. Behold:

Just to add to the above - starting this week with Pragmatics live casino drops and win promotion they have drastically reduced the prices ( they’ve split the prize pool in half basically and added the other half as prize drops) so it is not worth doing unless you play 24 hours a day as many tables as possible and go for 1st or 2nd position. I can’t compete for first because there are people more hardcore then me - I never came first since June- always 2nd-10th using my judgement as to what position to push for and remain profitable. But what do you know about physics to aid you in this thinking of physics???? What understanding of physics do you have?

I’ve been play 6 to 11 roulette tables at once for a minimum 16 hours per day. Betting £1.30 per spins. Using the most previous week as an example, averaging 600 spins per hour and using the 1 hour reality check - which states total bets placed, total bets lost net position - my expected cost per hour is an average of £16. The real cost per hour ranged from the extreme of -£110 per hour to +£48 per hour. The maximum I expected to lose per week, based on the RTP and at 16 hours of play a day was +\- £1800 I have been doing this since June as I’ve been playing the weekly pragmatic play live roulette tournaments. I would do it until I was comfortably in the top 5 positions and sure my score would hold up. prize structure: 1st £5k 2nd £3k 3rd - 5th £2k 4th - 10th £1k A couple of times, if several people got an initial massive lead I’d settle for a 4th - 10th position and scale back the cost by playing less. every week cost between £500-£1800 depending what position I went for. Every week I plays 30 000 to 60 000 spins. Every week I came 2nd - 5th unless a few players got stupidly lucky at the start in which case I scaled things back and settled for £1k prize. The only week I didn’t make £500-£2000 profit was during responsible gambling week as one casino enforced a year self exclusion on me , mid tournament, and sent me a load of emails informing me that I have a gambling problem. The thing is, I’m not gambling, I can calculate the cost of my adventures beforehand and only participate if I know, based on the maths, that it will be profitable. Deapite good and bad runs - nothing deviated from the expected norms. It may seem like a lot of effort but all I need to do is to refresh the auto play on the roulette games every hour - No effort or focus at all.

Just refer to any of your posts and you'll find such gems as: It absolutely has been proven that it works this way beyond a doubt, at least I think so, I believe it must work this way, but maybe it doesn't, but I think it must so that is proof enough for me. You said about crazy time after explaining how it works(in your head): It obviously works on some RTP based type thing... You can refute that you said such things if you like, prone to lies and wild exaggerations as you are. Your "personal opinion" is not "research" you plum. @Jeroen83 you moan that it is all rigged and inform people in a way that implies you have some inside knowledge about how slots work, - including that ridiculous theory stated as fact about how casinos are coded to return a percentage of deposits to the player. You then go on to win 135k and shortly after you are to be found in another post using the fact that you just won 135k as a counterargument to someone who made a post about how it is all rigged... literally within the same week. Constantly calling everyone else integrity into question as you are the only one with any integrity - bemoan how everyone is exploiting everyone else, except you - you are different. People need to wake up and realise their whole world fucking view is dependant on whether or not they are running hot or cold. @Stevej you only get one use of your little shutdown referencing my past, singular, mistake. There are hundreds of posts you have made which are absolute gibberish, I'll copy paste a Stevej gibberish compendium together when I get time.

@joshnadin good luck mate. I can't stomach how SteveJ will state things as fact when he really has no clue. As for Live Casinos online: I have a feeling Pragmatic is going to slowly take some of Evolutions live casino market share - their offering is good and only getting better, If Pragmatic can emulate the success they have had in the last couple of years with slots then they may even eclipse Evolution. Also, lol to the guy who said there is no RTP in landbased casinos, says it all you need to know about the minds involved in this circle jerk.

Another circle jerk echo chamber😂

Thankyou very much for posting a video showing how this game can pay as trying to find out myself has cost me a fortune!

It can still go absolutely wrong, never forget that, you should invest your cash in something so you don't have it available.

Why stand when you can HODL.

Demand a recount!

Was surprised by this as the site feels very U.K. centric to me. Didnt really play there often but it did have some games under a Guernsey license we which were kind of cute.