joshnadin
-
Posts
202 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by joshnadin
-
-
Not that I know the specific details of the terms of the bonus you had, but I could have recommended you stay away from this shady casino before you ever made an account there.
This is just one more example of why to stay away from crypto casinos with Curacao licences.
-
1
-
-
Whilst a customer service representative should have a basic knowledge of what RTP is, unfortunately many of them don't get taught the mechanics behind how the games actually work, and how casinos operate. They're just there to service basic customer service requests.
If you would have asked the rep for your profit and loss, they likely would have understood. Or, they may be new and just don't quite understand. If you get hold of a different representative, I'm sure they will be 100% happy to supply you with that info.
From the screenshot, I also don't see anyone 'flat out refusing' to supply anything.
--
As for you 'exposing' the casinos, I'd be eager to see your 'proof'. As and when you are able to supply that.
I don't want to get into the 101 reasons as to why there is no such thing as a 'cash dump' account, and how incorrect your theory is, as I've been down that rabbit hole many times on this forum. But, it's getting kind of painful seeing many threads just turn into baseless tinfoil hat theories without a shred of evidence or logic being applied.
Just because you've had a negative experience and have perhaps been more unlucky on a particular casino than the average player, does not mean that your, or anyone else's account has anything wrong, or is a 'cash dump' account.
With the least amount of offense intended, if this is legitimately your mindset, then you should refrain from gambling.-
3
-
-
I've just come across an Instagram post from Patrik Antonius, highlighting (at least some) of the line-up for High Stakes Poker - Season 9. There may be some other very well known, and lesser known names joining the line-up too.
As you can see, the line-up is pretty insane!
For those of you that don't know, this includes Phil Ivey, Daniel Negreanu, Tom Dwan, Patrik Antonius, Doyle Brunson, Koray Aldemir, and a couple of guys that I'm not familiar with. Maybe you guys can shed some light on who they are?
Oh! And not to forget our very own favourite streamer, Kim Hultman - A.K.A. Mr. Ding Sum!This line up is obviously full of legends from the poker world, including some extremely skilled poker pro's. To go through just some of their achievements -
Phil Ivey - Phil is an absolute boss. If you know anything about poker, you know Phil Ivey. He's won 10 WSOP bracelets, a WPT title, and is highly regarded by many to be the best all round poker player in the world.
Daniel Negreanu - A.K.A. Kid Poker. We all know who Daniel is, right? Daniel has bagged himself 6 WSOP bracelets and 2 WPT championships under his belt. He was regarded as the best poker player of the last decade.
Tom Dwan - 'Durrrr' is an absolute sicko who made a name for himself playing the nosebleeds online. Back in the days of Full Tilt Poker, Dwan made a cool $5.41 Million back in 2008 alone.
Patrik Antonius - Patrik is a Finish legend, who has millions in live tournament cashes, and is regarded as a heads-up specialist. He regularly joins the biggest cash games you'll find on the planet, and does very well in them too!
Doyle Brunson - is the original legend in the world of poker. A WSOP Champion, the first player ever to win $1,000,000 in tournament winnings, and is that much of a boss, has his very own poker hand named after him. Ten, deuce for the win, baby!
Koray Aldemir - is a German who won the latest 2021 WSOP, for a cool $8 Million. He also won the Trition High Roller in 2017 for $1.3 Million, and finished third in the One Drop High Roller for $2.1 Million. A newer kid on the block, but also a serious name in the poker world.
--
Between them, these guys have millions upon millions in tournament, cash game and online earnings, and are some of the most well known, and established players in the world.
I can't wait to be able to watch the the episodes when they're available!
I'm rooting for @LetsGiveItASpin - Casino Streamer to absolutely smash it, relieve these guys of some of their lifetime winnings, and come back to Malta a few million richer! I also realise that for Kim, playing with these guys will be a dream come true. I don't know anyone who's ever been into playing poker, and not one day dreamed of being in the position of playing high stakes with these guys.-
2
-
2
-
1
-
-
3,764x on an iSoftBet game? 🤯
Not bad, not bad! 👀 Get in! 😁
-
On 29/11/2021 at 12:00, wutse015 said:
but this casino "Cosmic Slot" is starting to piss me off
Cosmic Slot has generally pretty decent reviews on AskGamblers and around the internet in general - https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/reviews/cosmicslot-casino
However, it only has a Curacao licence, which is something that always puts me off. Then again, not all Curacao licenced casinos are dodgy. I think with this one you should be fine and will eventually get your money.
On 29/11/2021 at 12:00, wutse015 said:while waiting i played a round of book of dead couple of spins on 10 euro and hit a 10k bonus
Now i get an email that my withdrawls have been delayed and that they are checking with Play & Go to see if this win is legit????
i get that they maybe want to do some verification with a provider , but blocking my first withdrawls to?
That's more than annoying. I've never before come across an online casino wanting to check the result of a game round with the provider unless something is really off, and something extremely bizarre has happened. It's also 'only' 1000x. 10K is obviously a lot of money, but it shouldn't warrant them having to check whatever it is they're checking with the provider.
This may be a tactic that is seemingly prevalent throughout many online casinos these days. Unfortunately.
I'm assuming they haven't locked your account and are allowing you to play with said winnings? If they were so concerned about the validity of the game round, they wouldn't be letting you continue to play with the funds you've won.
If this is the case, it's likely a tactic to encourage you to keep playing and lose back what you've won whilst your 'verification' is being done, and 'checks' are being done with the provider. Don't be tempted! Make sure you take the lot to cashout-land!Either way, it's frustrating that some online casinos look through your game history as much as possible to try and find anything that may warrant any kind of a breach of the Terms of Service and may result in your winnings not being paid out.
-
34 minutes ago, dawka11000 said:
stake.com is like 1sec cashout
But, is also completely unregulated, has no ability to implement any responsible gambling features, alongside all the other reasons we know by now why these crypto-casinos are generally predatory, and unsafe.
Of course, if they're able to operate in your jurisdiction without having to circumvent the geo-restrictions, you're welcome to do as you wish with your own money!
14 hours ago, CasinoJunky said:just wondering if you could suggest a fast cash out casino.
Ask Gamblers has a pretty good list of fast-cashout casinos - https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/instant-withdrawal
I would always recommend you do your own research on how reputable a casino is, including what licence they have and making yourself familiar with the Terms of Service, and any bonus requirements before making an account and depositing. 🙂
-
1
-
-
70,798x 😅
Not bad at all! Get in mate 😁
-
1
-
-
Hacksaw tend to only save the bonus' for a limited period of time before they will automatically 'open' and the result be added to your balance. Or, as previously mentioned, if it's sadly a zero bonus, nothing be added to the balance. Dead or a Wild, as with anything from Hacksaw, is obviously super volatile, and can regularly pay out nothing in the bonus rounds.
Get in touch with Live Support, and if you can provide them with the Bet ID for the round that triggered the feature. They can get in touch with Hacksaw, and they will be able to provide you with a replay link for that specific game round so you can see exactly what happened. This may take a few days for the game provider to get back to them, but I've done this with a number of online casinos in the past.
-
Now that is how to gamble mate!
£20 in for a grand out two months in a row. Well in!
-
Super nice win buddy! My biggest Mental win is also through lobotomy spins, that upgraded into the mental free spins 😄
The top feature buy has never done anything for me!
-
1 hour ago, terror_82 said:
Well i think 98% of the players know the game is rigged, it's just you, all the other industry guys and streamers who defend it, it's your money there
so let's share some evolution videos once again, enjoy that shit
my favorit video on youtube (0:10)
look at this shit for gods sake (0:33)
Oh, look! My prediction came true! 😅
On 24/11/2021 at 08:25, joshnadin said:You’ll just keep posting more videos of ‘proof’, that are really just videos of unlikely events happening in a game of chance, and further speculation to support your narrative and thinking you’re ‘woke’.
Even more hilarious that that one of your videos of 'proof' is from Jeroens channel, who sadly got banned.. 🥲
--
You think that 98% of players think the game is rigged? 🤣
Amazing.
This really is the thread that just keeps on giving!
-
56 minutes ago, hateTINfoils said:
LOL another "no facts gathering" stupid post. Evolution IS operating in Ontario with those operators who HAVE LICENSE, you are playing on casino from Canada who has no license to operate in Ontario.
It actually just shows how COMPLIENT evolution is. They blocked all casino traffic in Canada to follow canada gambling law.
and yet you claim they are rigging games.... quite a contrast here...
See, other people are able to provide sound facts! You should try looking into it sometime.. 😁
-
7 hours ago, Stevej said:
everybody else realizes this though.
This just shows how delusional you really are 😂
Do you honestly not realise that you're in the vast, vast minority of people that believe what you're spouting? 98% of people who are capable of looking at something objectively and making an informed, intelligent decision about something do not believe that anything is rigged. But you're in the 'woke' 2% that knows the truth, right?! Everyone else is in a bubble and naïve!
You keep on your mission to expose the big nasty casinos and game providers that take all your money and don't play fair Stevie! 🙂
4 hours ago, terror_82 said:the narcissist cannot admit he is wrong
Sigh. If you're going to call me a narcissist then at least understand the definition of the word and use it correctly 🙄
7 hours ago, terror_82 said:you just keep on talking and talking, writing super long posts, nobody cares, and you don't have any facts, just your opinions. you talk about maths but it's just talking. So keep on writing these massive nonsense posts. your opinion became clear now.
If you don't care mate you could have stopped replying long ago. No one is forcing you to reply.
If you don't want to see that the fundamental principle of of the games operate actually are facts, and go and do your own research to understand what you're talking about, I can't help you.
My 'opinion', was clear long ago when I first commented on this thread.7 hours ago, terror_82 said:yes, I have lost lots of money to Evo, i have a gambling addiction and that's have nothing to do with this post.
I'm not attacking the fact that you've got an addiction or not, addiction is serious issue and nothing to be joked about. But, if your addiction is centred around playing with a certain provider, and you then go on to attack that provider because you've lost a lot of money, you understand why that's rather relevant, right?
It's just like the toxic people in the Crazy Time chat that are horrible towards the hosts, scream that everything is rigged and spam 'magnets' and 'breaks' every time there is a result where they don't win.
-
2 hours ago, Stevej said:
Actually you had zero facts and zero maths. Just your opinions. You are still in your bubble. I had my opinions too. Opinions are fine, but they are not facts.
Prove me the maths, don’t just keep repeating that fancy word. Without doing that, you’re as much opinion guy as everybody else.
We’re not going to get anywhere Steve. If I have to go out of my way to provide you with the fundamentals of the maths, which you won’t even be able to comprehend anyway, then my efforts would be completely wasted even if I was to do so. You’ll just go off on another, even more outrageous theory. Just like when you finally realised it would be impossible to rig the games without affecting the RTP, you went and came up with a different baseless theory. You’ll never accept it, as you don’t want to do.
If you don’t have the sense to look at the far more likely outcome that there are reasonable explanations for most things in life rather than there being a conspiracy, then you can’t speak to anyone about them being in a bubble.
1 hour ago, terror_82 said:You had only opinions moron. youre writing hours and hours of nonsense here but you say you have no time or interest to put the evidence together. because you dont have anything, just your opinions and fanaticism
It takes me around a minute to reply on the forum. It will take me hours of digging out information and data, then many more hours to format that into something presentable.
Judging from your post history on CG, you’ve clearly had a negative experience gambling online and seem to have many key indicators of a gambling issue. For some reason, you seem to be targeting Evo and are on some kind of bizarre crusade against them as you’ve clearly lost a lot of money to live casino games and are feeling some kind of way about it. Even going to the extent of regularly tagging them in your posts to try and get some kind of reaction out of them.
I too am way down over the long term playing all forms of casino games, as is expected. But that doesn’t justify calling things out as rigged, just because you didn’t like your experience.
Just like with Steve, and your friend Jeroen who has had his account deleted, you’ve made up your mind. So again, it’s pointless to continue any form of discussion. Myself and others have contributed some very sensible and logical reasoning as to why it would neither be beneficial or possible for any party involved, but you don’t want to know. You’ll just keep posting more videos of ‘proof’, that are really just videos of unlikely events happening in a game of chance, and further speculation to support your narrative and thinking you’re ‘woke’. I’ll keep explaining why it wouldn’t work, and the cycle will go on forever.
The whole thread became pretty toxic long ago, and I’m sure no one is interested at this point, including myself. But if anyone is interested, they have everyone’s viewpoint to consider, and can make their minds up themselves.
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, terror_82 said:
@joshnadindo you honestly believe that your opinions cancel out the validity of others opinions?
Facts and opinions are very different things, mate.
43 minutes ago, Stevej said:If you prove me it really is mathematically impossible then I happily admit I’m wrong. Until that you can continue doing those smart memes like that one. It was really funny. 🙂
For me to provide evidence that would be remotely valid, it will take many hours to put something together, that I unfortunately do not have, or wish to spend my time on.
I can just as easily turn around to you and ask you to prove to me that it is mathematically possible. But that's a waste of time, and energy, and we should perhaps look at the facts that have already been presented and come to our own conclusions.
If you want to continue your belief. You do you.
If the majority of people reading this post want to agree with the maths and common sense that have been presented, they can also do that.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Stevej said:
So now you took the last option and started making memes, calling me idiot etc. Trying to affect my emotions. It all turns against you. It actually takes away the credibility from what you’ve said.
Instead of doing new donald trump memes you can link the video for Kim video with three times back to back. Let’s calculate the odds and check your math skills and assumptions.
I'm clearly trying to demonstrate to you why I don't want to continue the conversation. And it's not because I'm avoiding anything. It's because nothing constructive or interesting is being added by you.
I'm not trying to affect your emotions mate, it's a little banter. We're all adults, and know better than to get pissed off by what someone has said online.
I don't want to go through the video archives to try and find the clip, it's too time consuming and redundant. That's even if it's uploaded to YouTube.
I don't want to calculate any odds, check my math skills or assumptions. I'm just honestly bored of the whole topic at this point.You're sitting there saying "you've provided a scenario where you can rig things without affecting the RTP". When you blatantly just haven't. Plus, besides the point, is again mathematically impossible. So I can't help but compare you to the pigeon just strutting around like it's won anyway.
It's just getting painful, isn't it Steve? At least for me anyway..
-
4 minutes ago, Stevej said:
You are avoiding to stay in the conversation.
Refraining to stay in the conversation until anything of value is added. Big, big difference than avoiding anything you have to say.
Please see above meme for reference ^ 🙂
4 minutes ago, Stevej said:You are the guy who doesn’t admit you’re wrong. I told a scenario where rigging would work without manipulating rtp while earlier you said it’s impossible. You were wrong: it is possible to rig without manipulating the rtp even though it is difficult. I also have many other really good reasons to rig live games. I can tell, sure.
Again, No you haven't. You've provided a theory. A theory with absolutely zero credibility at that. You've failed to mention how this could be sustainably implemented and work, because it can not.
8 minutes ago, Stevej said:In coding world there’s not a single thing we can’t do. Everything is possible.
What you mean is, in coding there aren't many things you can't do, and most things are possible.
But, as I said, I never said it wasn't possible to devise code to see in real time what outcome of the game would pay what out. I could hire someone on Fiverr to do that for me. What I said is impossible, is to implement such a code to benefit every single online casino using that provider. You really need to understand that because every player on every different online casino using the provider at the same time, no code in the world could 'rig' a result that is sustainably profitable across the board to each online casino using that provider. Not to mention the fact that I've previously stated that it would be highly visible in the providers profitability, and be investigated accordingly.
--
I must again reference the wise words of Donald Trump above, that is why I can't continue to try and have any kind of intelligent conversation with you.
-
33 minutes ago, Stevej said:
Hey man, I’m a web developer. We have amazing platforms and tools to collect data from every user in our sites. In real time yes. That combined with ai so you basically can do anything if you want. And now I’m saying that it is possible. Nobody has the facts.
Did I say it would be impossible to create software and coding where this could happen? No.
Difficult, but not impossible.
This theory could work if the provider was responsible for paying out the wins, or taking the losses for the game. But they're not. If you can provide me with any kind of reasonable explanation to how this would be implemented across every single casino that uses the same provider, with it consistently being in the benefit of all the casinos using said provider, I'll eat my words. You won't be able to do, because it is again, impossible.
33 minutes ago, Stevej said:Again, this is not fact. But it is truly possible to do if they want. You don’t see what’s in the code. You just assume everything works like they should work.
I'm not assuming. I'm using the maths and applying your theories to the real world, where they just do not add up, at all.
Besides this, if your absolutely insane theory was correct, and they had managed to devise a way to keep the RTP in line with what is advertised whilst manipulating profits (mathematically impossible again, by the way, bur for arguments sake), this would clearly show that a game is not operating properly and the expected profit is way, way more than it should be.
Regulators look into this all the time. The vetting process allows them to be able to turn up unannounced, and ask for the books at any time, and see exactly what is happening. If the amount of profit being made was in excess of what was expected, they would be investigated. Not to mention that the code you keep referencing, but we can not see, is also thoroughly vetted for fairness.
But, I forgot that all regulators are also in on the game and corrupt, right? 🙄
33 minutes ago, Stevej said:You can’t admit that you were wrong. I told a scenario where rigging would work without manipulating rtp - you told it’s impossible.
I'm not admitting I'm wrong, because I'm not wrong. If you can prove to me that I'm wrong, I'll gladly hold my hands up. You've come up with an extremely wild theory that I've already shown the maths does not work for, you've not provided a scenario alongside proof that works. Just a wild theory.
--
Look man, you're really just grasping at straws at this point. You're not going to listen to any logic, rhyme, or reason, no matter what I say. You don't want to know. You could be sent to the Evo studios yourself to get whatever data you wanted to come to a conclusion, and you still wouldn't want to know.
It's no longer interesting for me to continue the conversation as nothing of value is being added, it's just becoming painful. If you want to believe that things are 'rigged', you're entitled to your belief. But I must strongly emphasise that it's your belief.
At least I've been able to back up my statements with the maths behind the game, knowledge of how the games operate, and something of substance that isn't simply a video of a game round with a strange result, or a 'data sample' collected over 14 days by one player that is never going to be accurate or relevant.Peace out.. ✌️
EDIT:
11 minutes ago, Stevej said:The one last video.
The probability for this scenario is 0,000000015%. I have another video like this from the Evo game.
You can always tell yourself, things just happen. But when you’ve gambled 15 years and experienced similar scenarious yourself, you open your eyes. I don’t care what fucking tinfoil people call me, I really don’t. I don’t just trust people and these games anymore. Maybe I’m right, maybe I’m wrong. Who knows…
I love how this video is listed as 'proof' 😂
Since when did a highly unlikely outcome come to be considered as proof? Jesus.
By the same principle, Kim hitting a bonus in a slot a few years back, three times in a row back to back to back, with a very similar probability is impossible.
You guys really need to learn the difference between an event that is highly improbable, and not possible without 'rigging'.
-
10 minutes ago, Stevej said:
The game may emphasize giving winnings to players with lower stakes, so it also pays more players or new players. The players with higher stakes lose more. The benefit? The game is constantly gaining new players who at some point go to higher stakes and start losing like crazy. More players, more money. Rtp is correct.
So now what you're suggesting Steve, is that every online casino is in collusion with game providers to somehow tell them that one of their players is 'new', or not, and is in real time giving that data to the provider to alter the result in their favour?
What happens in the scenario that a high roller has bet on the same result that the 'new' and/or low stake player has bet on? How do the providers then rig the result? What happens when the betting on the game means a drastic loss to one casino using that provider for a spin, but to another means a nice profit? Do the casinos have an agreement that 'you can have this one, and we'll have the next'?
The more you look at what you're suggesting, the more ridiculous it is, and the more the logistics of implementing your wild theories become more and more impossible.
3 minutes ago, terror_82 said:So you try to avoid the idea that there would be no rigged roulette tables in this world.
I'm not trying to avoid any idea, I'm using the maths and facts that are available to come to a logical conclusion.
3 minutes ago, terror_82 said:Everything is possible in this world. You are just living in your bubble. I call you ... tinfoil!! 🤣
I can't begin to emphasise the hilarity that you're calling anyone tinfoil and living in a bubble after your 'contributions' to this thread. But please, continue.. 😂
-
1
-
-
Just now, terror_82 said:
I meant the specific roulette wheel at 1:50 in the video. So you know well that is not rigged. Good. I trust you.
I don't care about a specific point in the video, or how many YouTube clips you can paste into the thread that shows something outside of the expected behaviour of the game occurring.
The maths does not lie. Data that anyone can independently verify does not lie.
The fact that it would be impossible to sustain 'rigging' the result of a roulette wheel as a provider that caters to multiple online casinos all using the same games, at the same time, with said casinos independently either profiting or losing on a spin-by-spin basis depending on what result the players using that online casino bet on; there would be no way to 'rig' a result that would benefit either the provider, or any of the online casinos.
Please. Look at the actual facts and approach the conversation objectively before you just keep looking at videos of something you can't explain and insisting that something is 'rigged', without thinking about the fundamental logistics and mathematics behind what your claiming are impossible.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, terror_82 said:
So you think it's not rigged?
I don't think it's not rigged. I fully well know it's not rigged. 😂
It's mathematically impossible to be rigged.
We've already established with Steve that even his own independent data shows that the games are paying out exactly in line with what the expected RTP is. If a game is paying out exactly as is advertised, how can the house be applying any kind of further unfair advantage, apart from what is already being advertised as the house edge?How are you so unable to look at a video of something happening that is out of the ordinary and just start screaming that everything is rigged, without applying some actual, logical thought process to what you're saying? I don't know why I have to keep telling you that if you do something over, and over again enough times, you are going to experience bizarre results. But that doesn't mean that something is 'rigged', whatever your thought process of 'rigged' actually is.
-
1 minute ago, Stevej said:
But did you read my comment?
Yes, I did.
2 minutes ago, Stevej said:On those 14 days he didn’t get a single session over that house edge. All below it. That’s weird, not the rtp of the experiment.
Why? It is that hard to believe you can go 14 days playing roulette and get unlucky?
I can personally say that I've had periods of time where my RTP across games has been far, far less than the stated game RTP for much longer than 14 days. I've also had periods where I seem to keep hitting literally everything I touch and my RTP has been far, far in excess of what is expected for more than 14 days.It's not at all weird, because the sample size is absolutely tiny, and only incudes a single persons perspective and data. Another player, playing different numbers, for the same period of time, on the exact same game, could have been well in excess of the expected RTP.
But what's important, is that you need to include every single players RTP, over a sustained period of time to get anything close to an accurate reflection.
-
-
1 hour ago, Stevej said:
I think the result is weird. Even though the experiment was only 14 days, all the results were heavily below that 2,7% house edge. There wasn’t a single day over that house edge.
14 days from one single player is absolutely nowhere near a large enough sample size to determine any kind of RTP for any game.
The theoretical RTP is calculated over millions and millions of game results, across every single player playing that specific game.
If the person in question had been playing roulette for 6 months, consistently, and he didn't get any results over the stated RTP or his overall RTP was not within a very close margin, then it may be weird.
Party Casino Cash Dump Account
in Casinos & Sports
Posted
Waiting for your back up, buddy! Because as of right now, you have none. 😅
I no way believe that you've put multiple spins though multiple a slot sessions, over a two year period, and won no more than 10x. If you can show me some evidence of that, I'll eat my words.
I don't even know what you mean by 'slots linked to the provider'. But, I do have a thorough understanding of how slots operate between the online casino, and the provider. So if you want to expand on what you actually mean, I'll be happy to provide my input.
Cool. Story. Bro. 👍 👀