Royal Panda Complaint

[Jjamer99]

21 hours ago, Melvin - Royal Panda said:

Just to clarify, there is no downside to taking our bonus. In that case his play would have stopped after the first 100 deposit. In this case, he's managed to turn his bonus into €900 with only €3000 WR.

You keep on telling yourself that Melvin, the rest of us know that it is a piss take.

I'm glad that I've read this as I was going to join Royal Panda. I won't now though.

[jermain112]

Hi mate i had the same thing happen to me. What i did was have fun with the bonus balance until i got it up to 2 grand. At that point it became worthy of a re-deposit. I then chose favourable games for wagering and finished with nearly 1800. Its very doable just think about it properly before you do anything. 

[bootsyboy7]

good grief iam horrified .....the poor person who thought had 900 in bank,,,,this needs banning ........

sound a bit like casino rewards group

[BoracicLint]

Is this a little similar to Videoslots in that you get a percentage as you pass certain wagering thresholds and they release percentages of the bonus? 

I think any casino which requires you to redeposit while showing a bonus balance and not allowing it to be played with without more deposits are sharks. This situation has now scrubbed Royal Panda off my own 'to do' list until the bonus structure is changed.

[Toonarmy09]

I had the exact same problem at Lady Lucks Casino. They did me over for £2000 plus.  It was a real sickener, after my biggest slot win ever!!  I feel your pain!

[BoracicLint]

On 2/20/2018 at 16:22, Toonarmy09 said:

I had the exact same problem at Lady Lucks Casino. They did me over for £2000 plus.  It was a real sickener, after my biggest slot win ever!!  I feel your pain!

LadyLucks allow you to wager bonus after you've lost your cash balance so can't see what you mean here.

[Toonarmy09]

They certainly didn't with me actually. It fell under the 'mixed wagering' policy. Don't need to bore you with all the facts  @BoracicLint

[BoracicLint]

2 minutes ago, Toonarmy09 said:

They certainly didn't with me actually. It fell under the 'mixed wagering' policy. Don't need to bore you with all the facts  @BoracicLint

So they allowed you to wager on ineligble games and then confiscated your winnings?

[torriz]

On top of this horsesh*t their verification process takes 100 years. Slowest I've had so far (other than the shady curacao casinos). Melvin is nice, but it doesn't help when everything else is crap.

Got a €50 win from having the worst win on Bonanza - made it to 600-800, then the verification took so long I just played it all away and left.

Probably not going back there .

And yeah, ban? 

[bazza2281]

Worst type of bonus ever and Melvin trying to defend it is painful to read.

[Play The Game]

On 14/02/2018 at 14:07, Slotplayer said:

It is my understand that this type of bonus is going to be banned soon my the UKGC. Going forward you should always be able to withdraw money if your own money is in play. It will be end of the type of bonus Royal Panda / Bellfruit offers as well as the normal match bonuses where wagering starts immediately.

All that will be left are the parachute kind of bonuses where you can always cancel it and withdraw providing you haven't hit the bonus funds.

Good, No better than any other fraudsters in my eyes that royal panda lot!!!

[wertygo]

On 14/02/2018 at 15:53, Melvin - Royal Panda said:

In  your case, you were lucky enough to turn your bonus into €1000. The good news is that now you can really clear it with 100% certainty with a profit. Bad news if you don't have funds though, I do agree. On 3500 turnover on a 97% RTP slot, you'd lose ~€105.

97% RTP comes from billions upon billions of spins on test phase. How come could You promise this with 100% certainty!?