Jump to content

Mango__

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mango__

  1. Did I say that? No. Read again, and then try again.
  2. That's correct, signed up purely for this thread. I watch Jack predominantly and TakeTheHit, the odd occasion SS or Kim. Secondly why would Jack be so bait as to create a second account to make the posts I'm making? You think my grammar and vocab is that of someone that is not a native English speaking? You do realise that multiple people know exactly who I am, right? Again, Jack does play on what you call "real money" casinos, but why are you not speaking about the 100k wins on these "real casinos" either? Furthermore, why can you not address one single point in my post to you, or the post previous to that? Yet again, selective. You're a clown. Go to bed you pleb.
  3. And while we're on the subject of hypocrisy/double standards. Jeroen83's signature makes interesting reading. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIJ51MjeBuAO9eA3jW7JIkQ/about "Someone who despises streamers with deals." Prejudiced opinions then? And the irony? The casino affiliation link at the bottom of the page. The practice that he's so against. Good job.
  4. Easy make +100k withdraws - what do you mean easy? In regards to what aspect? The process of withdrawing it? I assume so given your subsequent sentence references people struggling to withdraw 1k... Not one person on the stream has had an issue with withdrawing, so are you again speaking anecdotally? They have a 200% (not 200-300%) bonus - one, you say, real players aren't allowed - I assume you mean typical players? Despite someone posting about one straight away in this thread that they had? I can't be bothered to check but, Casumo? Using your logic, anything you play with on a casino that you didn't deposit is not "real money" and it's casino money. Your 50e free sports bet? Casino money. Your 100% match deposit upto 100e with 10x wager? Casino money. With 0x wager? Casino money. Tired of the way they promote gambling with their huge win even though they have a massive wager... So there should be no wins in videos that have a wagering requirement? Can you name me which of the CG members that do NOT play with bonuses and/or do not upload videos which have been from a balance with "casino money" as you put it? (again, for the sake of clarification, you term "casino money" as anything that is added that is not part of your deposit). You certainly are allowed you have your opinion, however misguided and flawed in logic it is, even if your application of it differs dependent upon who you are discussing. But as I've already said, the issue is you presenting your opinion as fact. And if you're going to say you play at a casino and never take any bonuses/promotions/cashback/loyalty, then you'll full of it (despite what is already evident). Furthermore, you glossed over the points I made at the end of my previous post? Again, selective.
  5. What I don't understand is the posts of pure conjecture? Jimm - you're throwing around your opinion as fact, if you're going to make such claims do you want to provide an evidential based rationale? Something that isn't just your opinion? You say you only want to see withdrawals yet you only watch win highlight videos and not the stream? Playing for 10hrs at 10e or 20e stake is fake despite what you consider real money players doing the same and not being defamed by yourself? Asle - "Fake", again, based solely on your opinion because $8k buys can't be real? So you never win and play higher stakes than you usually would and try your luck? You don't make buys at 5-10% of your balance? So if you have a 200% deposit bonus, that by virtue of it's wagering requirements means you need to play loosely and hit some big wins to stand a chance of cashing out, meaning that when you get to that point you'll have been lucky and have a large balance to play with? Jeroen throwing his two pence in based solely on his single experience with Gamdom, which arose from his inability to deposit to the correct wallet which is explicitly noted - to send the correct crypto to the correct wallet. Which is then further "supported" by his experience with wagering for bonuses, which occured at other casinos? Making claims and instantly getting shut down in the next reply. None of these people want to talk about the losing of 5 figures day after day at times? Or the ~$50,000 that Jack has given away to viewers over a couple of months this summer? Or the far and few between instances when a viewer has an issue with Gamdom and the team, Jack included, gets the issue resolved? Selective. Jack must also have NoLimit on the payroll too, getting his wins to show up on their leaderboard also....
×
×
  • Create New...