From your response I would assume you are a casino apologist, former employee or a former affiliate. That is the only explanation as to why you cannot see anything absurd here. You cant see any case being ruled in my favour? You clearly know nothing about consumer law (You weren't aware, or don't want others to know, casinos are governed by EU consumer law)
I've not said i provided screenshots of pdfs. Look at their emails. They are asking for camera taken pictures of pdfs? Again utter lunacy)
TO REFRESH.....I HAVE PROVIDED:
- .PDF POA OF BANK STATEMENT DATED TWO MONTHS AGO, (DEPOSITS TO MR GREEN ON THIS)
- CREDIT CARD DATED TWO MONTHS AGO (PDF)
- UTILITY BILL (INTERENT) PDF
- SELFIE WITH PASSPORT X 2
- CARD PICTURES X 1
- PASSPORT X 1
All taken (where applicable) with my sons new iphone with an amazing camera.
William hill being the parent company is extremely relevant as I used the same docs and was verified within minutes. Meaning the documents are okay for the parent company to complete KYC but not for the subsidiary? Thats absurd, even if they have different KYC procedures. You need to stop flogging a dead horse and arguing against this.
More absurdity - Mr Green asked for a FOURTH POA after I sent the second and third and detailed I had no more. Its COMPLETELY UNREASONABLE to expect an individual to have copious amounts of documents and they clearly asked for a fourth knowing I had nothing further. Its delaying tactics, classic behaviour of terrible casinos as most people give up and the casino collects the money.
Moreover (further absurdity) it is COMPLETELY AGAINST CONSUMER LAW for a vendor to refuse a refund to a customer if they reject their custom. They have everything they need detailed under KYC and are simply now (by the legal definition) attempting theft.
The reason I believe you are probably someway affiliated (or have been) with casinos is your points on AML. THEY ARE ABSURD AND IRRELEVANT. The casino had no issue letting me deposit multiple times with no KYC. The money could of been stolen or dirty, They were fine for me to deposit when they thought I would lose it.....
5 minutes research online will show anyone ECOGRA IS NOT NEUTRAL. Just look at the percentage of cases that go against the player.
Mr Green are refusing to respond to emails, refusing to acknowledge I do not have a fourth POA and refusing to return the balance. If you don't think this is absurd and disgusting behaviour I can only assume you are not a rational and fact finding individual.
Please stop dragging this thread into faff.
Hi,
What is this?