Stevej

This company has so low reputation cause there is something weird happening in these games. One of those weird thing is that those wheel games are not "analog" but there are some mechanism that keeps the wheel spinning or breaks it. Why? I have no idea. You can notice this example by looking at the "hot spots" in wheel. The numbers next to bonuses gets hit much more often than the other spots (although the overall odds for each sector is always correct to make it look good on "paper"). You can follow the game live and count how many bonuses you would get if the bonus sectors were either one step right or one step left and it is always much higher than in the real game. Just for fun, I opened CasinoScores and Crazy Time live to take two screenshots from the game. These were just two consecutive rounds of the game, maybe it was just pure accident or then not...

Hi, I recently had an eye-opening experience that confirmed some suspicions I've had for a while regarding Evolution Gaming's live games. I've long believed that these games are unfairly biased against players making large bets. It seems that when high rollers are involved, the games seldom trigger bonuses or high payouts. As a result, I've avoided wagering real money and have stuck to playing with free spins only. Today, something interesting happened. I signed up at a casino that offered me 20 free spins and won about 8 euros. I moved on to place larger bets on slots and won 3,000 euros. However, I soon discovered that the maximum cashout for winnings from free spins was only 50 euros. Deciding to push my luck, I played max bets on slots and my winnings skyrocketed to ~19,000 euros. I reached out to customer support about this, but their response was as you might expect. Following this, I decided to conduct a live game experiment with Evolution Gaming's Monopoly. I placed maximum bets on 5, 10, 2 rolls, and 4 rolls (750, 500, 250 and 100 euros). As soon as I started betting, the game consistently landed on the lowest outcomes—1s and 2s. Interestingly, the moment I stopped betting, the outcomes shifted to 10 and 2 rolls bonus. This was exactly the biased behavior I had anticipated. I've seen this happening to streamers multiple times back then when someone still wanted to play these games. Despite this, I still have a balance of 10,000 euros, which I consider "real money," and I plan to continue this experiment. @Evolution Gaming Official

Scam.

Evolution Gaming - in live casino games this is the "evolution" part you are playing against to

Good stuff!

It's all about how you define "rigging". This provider is licensed for sure. I.e. these wheel games do not have a real analog wheel. Digiwheel creates "live looking games" that runs with some motor system.

I think many people know that these games have rng behind everything. However CEO itself has said that the wheel games are analog, but this is total bullshit - it's rng behing every single thing, also giving the output for the analog wheel, but they want users believe that it is an "analog wheel".

I can only find complaints about this company and it's really difficult to find any positive comments about @Evolution Gaming Official. I can't understand how they are still able to run this whole rigged shit system. This company has ruined the whole online casino business.

Guys, I tell you. These games are not fair in any level. I ran a site for statistics for Evolution Gaming Crazy Time (Crazy Time Bot - https://crazytimebot.live). I closed the site because the game started to go so bad (and I didn't want to pay the server expenses). I have some statistics from the year the launched the game and also stats from this year - the difference is like a night and a day. It's a pyramid schema. Horrible games.

Evolution, what are you doing? 13:20 -> @Evolution Gaming Official

I became interested, so I got the data from tracksino. I calculated the accurate count of doubles using python, and then performed a cumulative probability analysis. 1month: n = 7524 # number of trials k = 1013 # number of successes p = 1/6 # probability of success on a single trial The cumulative probability of getting 1013 or fewer doubles in 7,524 rolls is: 1.0441032956734961e-14 I'm pretty sure this is the correct amount of doubles. It's bit low still and quite unlikely event, but I still can't verify if there are no errors in the data, so I just leave it there.

Yeah, that seems to be the case. Those stats are completely off. Well, maybe it is legit then!

Relax man. My opinion is that, in any case, they are not doing anything illegal, it's just that people don't understand how their games work. For me they are not live games. Let me know if you find a single day in history where the doubles were at least in their average level. That event does not exist in history.

You can calculate the scenario via python script just simply: from scipy.stats import binom # Parameters n = 7515 # number of trials k = 479 # number of successes p = 1/6 # probability of success on a single trial # Calculate cumulative probability cumulative_prob = binom.cdf(k, n, p) print("The cumulative probability of getting 479 or fewer doubles in 7,515 rolls is:", cumulative_prob) Result: The cumulative probability of getting 479 or fewer doubles in 7,515 rolls is: 3.489497726420227e-158 And just to remind that if you dive inside that 7515 trials and create sub-sets of it, the doubles seem to be lower in each sub-set I've checked these: 117 / 1,892 (6.18%), 43 / 809 (5.32%), 19 / 265 (7.17%), 11 / 133 (8.27%), 4 / 74 (5.41%) Last month

I don't think you understand maths so well, and not being really precise about the details. Have you ever seen any transparent video running and people "behind that video"? Although, I don't know if it's a video, but that's technically possible.