Jump to content

Avidgambler

Members
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Avidgambler

  1. Thought to share this beauty hit with 3 wilds and lot of premium symbol all the way through. Sadly on a min bet, but I'll take it. Personally biggest win x wise that I've seen on this slot. Whole bonus paid just shy of 38 000x.
  2. 43x win with 0,2 euro bet. Feedback: Not huge fan of the game. I usually like the pop games but this one is not that exciting. There is probably huge potential and the game seems to be really volatile. The bonuses didn't pay much at all and they were over really quick. Theme and music are decent I guess. Mechanic wise I prefer the other pop up games.
  3. 557x, 0,2 euro bet Review of the game: I really like the game. It is fun to play and offers quite a bit of excitement. I also like the different bonus buy options. Very volatile but lots of potential too. The dynamic with the coins in the bonus is nice. Overall a solid game and one of the better releases of the push gaming in a long time. Will give this one a go also in the future.
  4. @firstcasino That is an incredible win sir, big congrats. Which casino is it played though? Only wins played on Leovegas are valid for this promo. That being said, this slot seems cool, I'm going to give this one a go and start chasing that top spot. Good luck everyone!
  5. 195x, 0,2 euro bet The game is okay but nothing special. Sounds are fresh and I like that there are multiple options for different bonus buys. Re triggers seem to happen quite often so the multi can get easily high.
  6. Leovegas/ 0,20 euro bet/ 810x So far I really like this game and especially the different bonus options. Big fan of the graphics and overall theme to. Healthy dose of volatility too!
  7. Really nice win congrats! Biggest one I have seen so far without the multipliers. @Crimecasino Yeah they are hard to get. Unless you have the money to by them of course for 1000x bet. I got them once from the random bonus buy(10 % chance to get mental spins), so got pretty lucky there. If you don't want to or can't do bonus buys, then chances to land those are very slim. In order to trigger mental spins from base game spin will take several thousand spins on average.
  8. 121x at 0,2 euro bet on Leovegas Feedback on game: It isn't the most exciting game, but pretty decent nonetheless. Not biggest fan of the theme though. Wild thingy on bonus game was fun and has some potential. Gameplay was smooth tho.
  9. @FreeWheelerBaby Yeah I encourage you to clarify things with them. After all there are some things we can only speculate about and make educated guesses. Hopefully you get the answers from them!
  10. I'm sorry to say mate but this sounds a bit tinfoil to me. It makes perfect sense to give free spins absolutely yes, there are multiple reasons for this. It is in casinos interest to engage players, make them feel noticed, make them try new games, people granted free spins might get excited and make a deposit etc. After all the fee spins already made you log in so it is easier. The impact (if there is any) to players total RTP is completely secondary if not insignificant from the casinos point of view. Keep in mind that many of the recreational players don't even know what RTP is yet alone care about it.
  11. I don't now why the overall RTP has showed to jump between 39 % and 94 %, that is definitely very odd. I'm also not sure what formula Videoslots uses to calculate the players overall RTP but if they used the suggested way we speculated in this topic which is: total wins (of all games) divided by total amount gambled (in all games) then the smaller bet wins and losses have relatively small impact. Now I'm certain that 39 % couldn't even be your actual stated RTP since you have played there for 7 years and obviously have had quite a bit of volume. When playing 94-98 % RTP games for such a long time it would be borderline impossible to get such low avg RTP. Even 90 % RTP would be a very bad result in my opinion. For shorter period of time the RTPs can be sometimes minuscule though. But even for a shorter session the 39 % is pretty rough (can happen though). To have such low RTP for 7 years when the expected return is over 90 % is absurd. Only way I could even in theory see this happen is that if you played very very low amount of spins with very very high bets and just got extremely unlucky. 1000 spins with 200 pound bet with extremely cold run in a volatile game could explain your numbers and 39 % RTP but this is likely not the case.
  12. @mosmagic I admit, I can be a bit wordy and overly complex when I try to explain things. It is partly because I'm not a English native speaker However it is not just semantics and explaining it in other words. We actually disagree about the fundamental thing. Yes the game has its theoretical RTP, but again the game doesn't adjust to losses (or to wins for that matter). The game coding makes sure that in the long run it operates (gives out wins and losses) very very close to the stated RTP. (Apart from some jackpot games, where the jackpot resets) The game doesn't know or care about previous results. It could theoretically give you two maximum wins in a row. Or dish out huge wins to players left and right, in theory. But this is obviously highly highly unlikely. Usually when game pays for a longer time massively over it's stated RTP it is due to a malfunction. The chances of getting two maximum wins from a slot in a row is astronomically high. Not impossible but very very unlikely. The game can have some spikes up and down but because how it operates (how it is coded) with enough volume it will get closer and closer to the stated RTP. Now your example is pretty extreme and it is highly highly unlikely such a huge win would happen upon 5 minute of the game release because on average the amount of spins to trigger such win would be really really really high (hundreds of millions minimum). On many games with much lower maximum wins it can take ages until the maximum win happens. But yes It could theoretically happen and game would continue to operate without any adjustment.
  13. Well I mean I don't know or have access to the actual numbers, I just calculated an example of the volume you should have had based on your net loss and the stated avg RTP of 94 %. Those numbers seem pretty reasonable though and given that you have played fair amount of png and pragmatic lower RTP setting slots and assuming you have had quite a lot of volume the stated avg RTP also makes sense.
  14. @mosmagic I get where you coming from, but I'm pretty sure you are looking the adjustment the wrong way. Now there might be some exceptions (certain jackpot slots and collect bonus games etc. come to mind) that use the information from previous rounds. But even then it shouldn't determinate what the game is going to do next. (it might affect the expected RTP short term though) But for the vast majority of games the previous results have no impact whatsoever. Every spin is in fact independent. Lets says an example game is governed by the set of perimeters and mathematical model of sort that governs the win distribution, win frequency, bonus chance, volatility, maximum win etc, When the game is designed and created the game provider already has a pretty good understanding of the expected RTP of the game. At this point they will do extensive testing of millions and millions of spins (for very volatile slots this can be even higher). At this point some fine tuning and calibration might occur if needed. But when the game passes the tests and gives out wanted RTP it is good to go. So if the example game came trough testing after 200 million spins at 95 % return to the player, that is it. On some games it is even stated that the expected long term return to the player is xx % based on xxx million spins outcome distribution. So the game doesn't have to adjust anything positive or negative or know what happened previous spins. It only spins by the set of perimeters/ mathematical model and in the long run it will dish out very very close to the expected RTP. In short term games can pay out more than their stated RTP (and this has happened) or run "cold" and go under it. But when there is enough volume the average RTP will quite fast start to settle towards the stated RTP the game is suppose to pay.
  15. I think there is a misconception here, that also explains some of your previous comments and questions on this thread. Your stated overall RTP on Videoslots (94 % in this case) isn't calculated from your overall deposits and withdrawals but rather from total amount returned (wins) divided by total amount gambled (spins x your bet) as @joshnadin already told you. We can actually have a good estimation of your playing volume from the numbers you have provided. So at the span of 7 years the total amount returned and gambled could be as high as 203 700 (returned wins) divided by 216 700 (total amount of gambled). This gives you roughly 94 % overall RTP and result of net loss of 13 000. Reality is the relation of deposits and withdrawals is for vast majority of players much lower than the average RTP of games they play. This is mainly due to the simple fact that if you keep playing a let's say 94 % RTP game long enough it will slowly but steadily drain you'r balance towards zero. Obviously luck and volatility also affect especially on shorter term. But in theory it is possible for a player at same time have 99 % RTP and still lose all of his/her deposits without any withdrawals. Now in reality it isn't quit that grim since players get lucky and/or withdrawal before they lose it all back. But you get the picture why the game RTP can be seemingly high while the relation of deposits and withdrawals is often much lower. This is also the major reason how casino industry is making money. If all of their customers would have as high deposit/withdrawal ratios as are the RTPs they woud go out of business very soon. Instead they are banking on people who keep playing and playing and cycling that money until that ratio (on average) drastically drops. And it is not just that the ratio drops. Also because of the cycling the total amount of deposits usually grows which results on average bigger total amount of losses.
  16. Well I mean truth to be told, winning big is hard. No way to sugar-coat it. You have to get very lucky or play a lot, preferably both. But remember that all slots are - ev games so spinning tens of thousands of spins might not be the ideal solution. Game selection doesn't have that huge of an impact, more than anything it just boils down to being lucky. Now game selection wise, I would still prefer medium to high volatility slots since you don't have the option of bonus buys (and ofc hight rtp is preferable). Like I personally also play quite a lot relax and nolimit city games and such but to be honest most of the newer and more volatile ones are more suited for bonus buys in my opinion. For no bonus, I personally like to go for some elk games, btg, even net ent and blueprint offer some good options just to name a few. Anywayws gl! You will hit big eventually.
  17. Yeah some casinos have chosen to use lower RTP versions of play'n go slots. This also affects the odds of getting a bonus. I also have noticed the difference. Now 3 hours without a bonus seems excessive but even with a higher rtp setting you will get every now and then some dry session like 1000 spins without a bonus if you play these slots a lot. The bonus frequency isn't that high I think. Maybe on avg 1/300 spins or so on a higher rtp setting. On a lower setting it is worse I think. If I remember correctly reactoonz 2 had slightly higher bonus frequency. Yesterday I made the mistake to try the new gigatoonz game (a 94 % setting one). Now granted I also was very unlucky it took me over 2000 spins to get a bonus. Luckily it was on a low bet but still sucks. When the bonus eventually came it paid just shy of 30x.
  18. 713x, 0,2 euro bet Leovegas I think this is a decent game. I do like a lot of Iron Dog games. This is bit different than their usual releases though and not in a bad way. Nice overall feeling and plenty of potential too. Also base game has at least some appeal as well.
  19. Nice wins buddy. It is definitely a volatile game. I tried some bonus buys with min bet and bonus bet activated so 0.15 total bet. Maybe 15 or 20 buys total and none of them paid even 200x. Had few with the premium symbol and some 4 scatter starts but didn't help.
  20. Yeah nice win. I tried this game too, lost 500 bets (roughly 2000 spins) without a bonus. Biggest win was 25x lol.
  21. And while at it I might add that getting a bigger and bigger win usually gets progressively harder. So getting a 5000x win isn't 5 times harder than getting a 1000x win but more. So for example the Relax game Iron Bank. For normal spin getting a 1000x win or greater might be a 1/20 000 chance. Getting a 5000x or greater win might be a 1/500 000 chance. And getting the max win of 50 000x from a normal spin might be 1/ 250 000 000 chance. For bonus buys (100x stake) these chances might be on average: Getting a 1000x win or greater might be a 1/75 chance. Getting a 5000x or greater win might be a 1/1000 chance. And getting the max win of 50 000x from a bonus buy might be 1/ 1000 000 chance.
  22. Max win for Reactoonz is definitely not 1500x, but closer to 5000x, 4750x to be exact if I remember correctly. I've never seen one though, but I have seen above 3000x wins on it. Now getting a 5000x win is a pretty damn hard, much harder than people usually think. I think this is mainly due the raising popularity of bonus buys and volatile games in general. It seems 5000x wins happen all the time, when in reality they don't. I have never got a 5000x win from normal spin and I have been an active gambler for years. Best one I got is 2500x and some more between 1000x and 2000x. Now I do tend to play bonus buy games and from bonus buys I have multiple over 5000x wins but those are effectively not 5000x wins as in 5000x times the bonus buy bet. From normal spin chances of winning 5000x or a greater win varies a lot between slots and info isn't that easily found generally, but I give a rough estimate of between 500k and few million spins. So yeah u gotta get pretty lucky and spinning a million spins is costly. I am interested to know if someone has some actual numbers for different slots though. Now obviously for bonus buys this is completely different as my results also show. With a standard 100x bet bonus buy the chance might be 1 out of 1000 bonus buys for example and for some degenerate bonus buy like San Quentin (2000x stake!!) seemingly low like 1 in 100 for example. But as I said these are not comparable to normal spin wins.
  23. 213x 0,2 euro bet. This was my best approx from 30 or so bonuses. Feedback: I will try look beside the point that this slot made me feel it has like 50 % rtp. Both base game and bonuses were just brutal. Had quite a lot of 0x bonuses too. But I guess that is sometimes expected with these volatile slots, if you run bad. However even apart the bad run, this slot just didn't quite do the trick for me. Base game is somewhat boring and bonus games aren't that innovative. The green valley had something going, but I feel the icepark one has been done many times better and more creative ways already. The general graphics and sounds are fine but for me this game just didn't have the exciting factor and appeal that would bring me to it in the future.
  24. Yeah the bonus buy option was available at least for me when the game originally launched on leo. By the time this comp started it wasn't available anymore. Now the bonus buy option seems to be back however. I guess they are allowed for the comp?
  25. Leovegas 2546x / 0.4 euro bet Very volatile game, but I like it. First bonus didn't pay crap. This was my 2nd 4 spin bonus buy that also didn't look that promising first. Before the last spin I got some multis and better set up. However all the money came from the last respins. Got 3 cannons and one with 2x, that completed multiple lines with 22x multi.
×
×
  • Create New...