Xxxxwildingxxxx

It serves more of a purpose voiding players who accidentally went over max bet in general for this term I guarantee this term has blocked players and voided winnings more than what you say it's used for players abusing bonuses anyway thanks for your update I believe more can be done to help players who accidentally went over max bet you say you do help but it means nothing if it's not in your terms as in generAl you can pick and choose at ones timing when to use that so the gesture you say is worn only as a trusted basis not something that players can rely on .where I think it should be in terms thanks again

I'm not missing the point you do alot for players allowing the wave the bet over wagger max so the player can still cash out ! But if it's not a term it's up to the casino Weber I get my withdrawal if I mistakenly bet over max bet in wagger . If it's not in terms where I know where I stand by law then your gesture is good but only 95% good like you said if it was in your terms then I wouldn't take it for granted and be hoping if I bet over max bet wether the casino is going to wave it ! If you have this rule I believe the player should know in a term and condition basis what there getting mate

If you bet over €5 ,3 euro it should never be a casinos choice wether you get your money if th void is for bonus abuse and not for getting over the max wagger bet then it should be stated in terms IMO. Otherwise casino can choose at there timings who get a cash out or not for getting once or twice over the max wagger bet. I think the player should know to 100% know what there getting from terms not if the casino sometimes doesn't void hen they bet over terms should be used fairly not on a sometimes basis, if you allow it put it in your terms because players should have that law rule and not under the casino thumb , example sometimes you said you don't enforce the rule sometimes we should know where we stand on term rules

Are you saying you can't do a block for all on waggering over €3 on bonus but the few like you mentioned and affiliate take of the block. It's know that some casinos have this block I'm not talking about yours casino just in general I pretty sure you can select for all and take of the few that you allow!

If you want to protect yourself from scammers this block is perfect so I don't buy that! A block stops unfair winnings being voided and stops abuse on wagger a good tool so when I first brought this up the other day your reply said it's for abuse the terms if this tool works my question is why don't you use it . I know why not for you just in general it's because they want the possibility of voided winnings and if the block was on that possibility is gone anyway I respect your opinion to a degree It's not directed at you are it's just talking about term rules in general mate

If you don't put a block on bet over max bet or to allow the bet over wagger max but for it not to count the only reason you don't have these blocks so you can void winnings otherwise a good explanation to why you don't have these blocks.bwcuase my calculations if you had these blocks you wouldn't be able to void winnings thes the answer

My point is on some casino! a simple bet over the max is not abuse like you said! So I used the word timing some casino use terms in the perfect time to say that you broke terms, example broke terms from doing bet over the max, but how much effort is it to put Code or what ever it's call to not allow the bet to go through. or to allow the bet but for it not to count. And the fairest way of all Is to calculate all the bets that went over max bet and add the amount back to waggwr. Can I ask why don't you do an auto block then I can understand why other casino don't do it. Or put a block on the bet for wagger but allow the bet. if it's a safe guard rule for all casinos how do casino allow a void winnings when only sometimes bet is over max bet like a couple of time if it's for abuse that should be in terms to prevent any casino using it in there timings example the player had a couple of bets over max wagger and had is winnings void.the terms only mean what you put in them otherwise it can be used in the perfect timing of the casino and I don't see on some casino that it to prevent abuse as it's not it's to prevent winnings imo

if the max bet is 5 € code the game to close if betted over or code the bet anything over 5 to not count. The only reason for a max bet to count as term break is to void the winnings. If max bet on wagger causes terms break becuase they can wagger in an unfair way! Then why don't you just state and code any bet over 5 max bet on wagger doesn't count towards wagering , is it unfair to say the only reason casinos don't do this is to void winnings otherwise why not

Now that's a casino support I would like to join well said

The thing is if a forum helps a customer, then support in the first place wasn't good enough, because why should a forum help if your customer support is second to none to begin with, im not saying anything bad and not saying your bad support, but I would say a forum shouldn't be the difference off getting the very best! equality"

Wheres the uk market

I think it should be law for all activity rtp should be able to view on casino you play at meaning your activity

I'll take last place on this race unlucky random cold patch you hit there sir

I think slots fairly programmed and an end result of millions of spins would end up fair so hot and cold doesn't really make a difference. Any way I could be wrong it's just opinion I have and I'll do what that guy said read up on it and at least I'll get some education on how it works and then I could well have a better view about it. Just seems hot and cold at times one theory I believe the randomness is part of that cold patch which still is random hence hot patch to. But know one is ever sure when to stay on a game or to leave! My opinion it's fair yes I come to that conclusion but random patch of cold and hot games is there, when they should re program for it to be random per spin! But I dunno,

Yall need to take that tin foil hat off blocking Not off topic just to add !